

Absolutely not. Tailscale is witchcraft.
All pronouns


Absolutely not. Tailscale is witchcraft.


They’re not saying they did it for Meta’s own personal use. They’re arguing a bunch of private individuals did for their own personal use and they just happened to be using Meta’s network, which, given that this is about 157 downloads, it honestly makes sense.


Sad to say the title is clickbait. The only evidence the plaintiffs have that meta pirated their work for AI training is that a bunch of it was pirated from IPs belonging to Meta. Meta is arguing that this is insufficient evidence as it’s more likely that a bunch of individuals with access to Meta IPs downloaded the videos for their own personal use. Given the very small amount of downloads and how spread out they were, I have to reluctantly side with them.
How would they even get a Meta IP?
Like most offices, they have an open network that anyone can use so they’re arguing passers-by, delivery persons, visitors and such. I’m more inclined to believe it was employees but still.
According to the case cited by Meta, no you wouldn’t.